Current:Home > reviewsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -WealthRoots Academy
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-15 22:23:08
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (124)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Love Coffee? It’s Another Reason to Care About Climate Change
- Hollywood, Everwood stars react to Treat Williams' death: I can still feel the warmth of your presence
- COVID flashback: On Jan. 30, 2020, WHO declared a global health emergency
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Many Americans don't know basic abortion facts. Test your knowledge
- Fraud Plagues Major Solar Subsidy Program in China, Investigation Suggests
- Fraud Plagues Major Solar Subsidy Program in China, Investigation Suggests
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Why inventing a vaccine for AIDS is tougher than for COVID
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Kim Kardashian Alludes to Tense Family Feud in Tearful Kardashians Teaser
- FDA expands frozen strawberries recall over possible hepatitis A contamination
- The Fed is taking a break in hiking interest rates. Here's why.
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- What's a spillover? A spillback? Here are definitions for the vocab of a pandemic
- This Amazingly Flattering Halter Dress From Amazon Won Over 10,600+ Reviewers
- See Blake Lively Transform Into Redheaded Lily Bloom in First Photos From It Ends With Us Set
Recommendation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Why inventing a vaccine for AIDS is tougher than for COVID
What is the Hatch Act — and what count as a violation?
Ariana Madix Reveals the Shocking First Time She Learned Tom Sandoval and Raquel Leviss Had Sex
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
2016: Canada’s Oil Sands Downturn Hints at Ominous Future
The Nipah virus has a kill rate of 70%. Bats carry it. But how does it jump to humans?